<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Write and Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://suvudu.com/2010/12/write-and-wrong.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paranormal.suvudu.com/2010/12/write-and-wrong.html</link>
	<description>Suvudu - Science Fiction and Fantasy Books, Movies, and Games</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:37:07 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Stevens</title>
		<link>http://paranormal.suvudu.com/2010/12/write-and-wrong.html/comment-page-1#comment-22506</link>
		<dc:creator>John Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suvudu.com/?p=11134#comment-22506</guid>
		<description>Your last two sentences are really all that needs to be said.  There is so much advice out there, but it boils down to: &quot;write in whatever way gets you to produce something that satisfies both you and the audience.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your last two sentences are really all that needs to be said.  There is so much advice out there, but it boils down to: &#8220;write in whatever way gets you to produce something that satisfies both you and the audience.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://paranormal.suvudu.com/2010/12/write-and-wrong.html/comment-page-1#comment-22464</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suvudu.com/?p=11134#comment-22464</guid>
		<description>Great column, Ari. That bit about not outlining in ON WRITING has always stuck in my craw. Amusingly, one of the most common criticisms of King&#039;s writing (particularly his longer books) is the way he paints himself into corners and resolves complex plots with hokey deus ex machina ploys, mystical hand-waving, etc.

It&#039;s become so rote with him that I pretty much begin his books expecting them to slip into murky supernaturalism. Mr. King, I humbly submit that anything can become predictable when relied upon as a crutch. The true labor of plotting is in arranging events to cascade logically from one another, and ensure they hit the reader with both a sense of surprise and inevitability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great column, Ari. That bit about not outlining in ON WRITING has always stuck in my craw. Amusingly, one of the most common criticisms of King&#8217;s writing (particularly his longer books) is the way he paints himself into corners and resolves complex plots with hokey deus ex machina ploys, mystical hand-waving, etc.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s become so rote with him that I pretty much begin his books expecting them to slip into murky supernaturalism. Mr. King, I humbly submit that anything can become predictable when relied upon as a crutch. The true labor of plotting is in arranging events to cascade logically from one another, and ensure they hit the reader with both a sense of surprise and inevitability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


