<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Over is Over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://suvudu.com/2010/11/over-is-over.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paranormal.suvudu.com/2010/11/over-is-over.html</link>
	<description>Suvudu - Science Fiction and Fantasy Books, Movies, and Games</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:37:07 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason M Waltz</title>
		<link>http://paranormal.suvudu.com/2010/11/over-is-over.html/comment-page-1#comment-21195</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason M Waltz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suvudu.com/?p=9791#comment-21195</guid>
		<description>&quot;...like Ouroboros with the munchies...&quot; Great line Ari!

Oh, and article too ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;like Ouroboros with the munchies&#8230;&#8221; Great line Ari!</p>
<p>Oh, and article too <img src='http://suvudu.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Mayer</title>
		<link>http://paranormal.suvudu.com/2010/11/over-is-over.html/comment-page-1#comment-21055</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Mayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suvudu.com/?p=9791#comment-21055</guid>
		<description>Great post. I especially like the point that&#039;s it&#039;s often the perspective, not the genre, that&#039;s worn out.

It took 20 years for Steampunk to reach the point that people started claiming it&#039;s &quot;over&quot;. Truth is, it still has yet to hit the mainstream in any appreciable way.

It&#039;s easy to think your own taste is the same as popular perception, and that your awareness matches that of society at large, but it&#039;s rarely the case that someone focused on a genre truly has their finger on the zeitgeist of mainstream acceptance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I especially like the point that&#8217;s it&#8217;s often the perspective, not the genre, that&#8217;s worn out.</p>
<p>It took 20 years for Steampunk to reach the point that people started claiming it&#8217;s &#8220;over&#8221;. Truth is, it still has yet to hit the mainstream in any appreciable way.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to think your own taste is the same as popular perception, and that your awareness matches that of society at large, but it&#8217;s rarely the case that someone focused on a genre truly has their finger on the zeitgeist of mainstream acceptance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://paranormal.suvudu.com/2010/11/over-is-over.html/comment-page-1#comment-20969</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suvudu.com/?p=9791#comment-20969</guid>
		<description>I agree wholeheartedly. The problem doesn&#039;t lie in the subgenres themselves, but in, as you put it, &quot;cycle of influence and mimicry.&quot; Maybe because it&#039;s passe means its time for a new angle to be brought to the table.

It kills me to see people try and lump the entire vampire fiction genre as &quot;romantic,&quot; and therefore want to write a 150+ year old genre off because of that. While many books these days lean in a romance direction, it&#039;s an attitude that completely overlooks Lindqvist&#039;s &quot;Let The Right One In,&quot; Huston&#039;s Joe Pitt series, Farnsworth&#039;s &quot;The President&#039;s Vampire,&quot; Cronin&#039;s &quot;The Passage,&quot; del Toro and Hogan&#039;s &quot;The Strain,&quot; Grahame-Smith&#039;s &quot;Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter,&quot; Wellington&#039;s &quot;13 Bullets,&quot; Merz&#039;s Lawson books... those are &quot;current&quot; books just off the top of my head - several of which were high profile at that. And yet, over and over again, we hear how vampires are &quot;over&quot; and how romance ruined the genre. I&#039;m glad that you mentioned Kent and the Griffiths... I haven&#039;t read their books, but they look different than the style that critics want to lump all vampire fiction under</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree wholeheartedly. The problem doesn&#8217;t lie in the subgenres themselves, but in, as you put it, &#8220;cycle of influence and mimicry.&#8221; Maybe because it&#8217;s passe means its time for a new angle to be brought to the table.</p>
<p>It kills me to see people try and lump the entire vampire fiction genre as &#8220;romantic,&#8221; and therefore want to write a 150+ year old genre off because of that. While many books these days lean in a romance direction, it&#8217;s an attitude that completely overlooks Lindqvist&#8217;s &#8220;Let The Right One In,&#8221; Huston&#8217;s Joe Pitt series, Farnsworth&#8217;s &#8220;The President&#8217;s Vampire,&#8221; Cronin&#8217;s &#8220;The Passage,&#8221; del Toro and Hogan&#8217;s &#8220;The Strain,&#8221; Grahame-Smith&#8217;s &#8220;Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter,&#8221; Wellington&#8217;s &#8220;13 Bullets,&#8221; Merz&#8217;s Lawson books&#8230; those are &#8220;current&#8221; books just off the top of my head &#8211; several of which were high profile at that. And yet, over and over again, we hear how vampires are &#8220;over&#8221; and how romance ruined the genre. I&#8217;m glad that you mentioned Kent and the Griffiths&#8230; I haven&#8217;t read their books, but they look different than the style that critics want to lump all vampire fiction under</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


